Would I rather be an unhappy Kahlil Gibran ( don't ask me why Gibran, it could very well be Plato, Aristophanes, or one of the numerous modern thinkers) or a happy dog?
Happiness is so overdramatised. I am not happy until I have savoured the deeply humane thought towards the road of self discovery, on the other hand I am often happy just watching Stephen Fry make scatological jokes on QI. Maybe as a dog I would be happy just eating and fornicating a random bitch once in a while but the point I am trying to make is those are/ would be my choice at happiness.
When people start wanting me to be happy because of things I should have done/ could have done or should do I get majorly pissed. My happiness shouldn't be at your expense but rather on my choice and it this autonomy of the mind and freedom of choice that I want.
Aristotle gave the label megalopsychos meaning great souled. We already have Ramakrishna and Vivekananda carrying the bastion of great souled Indians( some might even say Satya Sai Baba and a few idiots, Ramadev)however I am not great souled and I refuse to be tied down to fit your conventions governing the structure of happiness. I'd rather be a happy Gibran if I can achieve that rather than be an unhappy one to amuse you, otherwise I am just happy being a happy dog